Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

 
 

Salon.com
[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Comics ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ][ Audio ]

Article Finder
Technology


 


Is Apple falling?
- - - - - - - - - - - -

apple


The age of computer heroes is over
Apple fans demand nothing less than "insanely great." But is it even possible to be a revolutionary anymore?

Editor's note: For the first time since Steve Jobs returned to the helm of Apple, there isn't much to cheer about in Macintosh land. The company is reporting that it will not make a profit in the current quarter. Sales of its new top-of-the-line G4 Cubes are below expectations, and both revenues and stock price are sinking. Can Apple's problems be explained away as just another symptom of an industry-wide slowdown? Or are there more fundamental forces at work? Today Salon attempts to answer such questions with three essays assessing the current state of the Apple.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Thomas Summerall

Dec. 19, 2000 | The father of a good friend of mine once lamented that his son entered college as a Republican Windows user but graduated as a Democrat and, perhaps worse, a Mac lover. The two conversions are parallel because Apple fans are the progressives of the computer industry, who believe that computers will continue to become not just gradually better but dramatically better. These improvements, they have been taught, arrive as dramatic jumps in power and ease of use every five or 10 years -- the digital equivalent of punctuated equilibrium, to borrow a term from Stephen Jay Gould.

Their quixotic faith in this evolutionary process has persisted even though the next quantum leap is now five or 10 years overdue. For some, the release of Apple's new operating system, Mac OS X, was going to be the next jump. But Apple's public beta test of its biggest OS update since the Mac was first released in 1984 may throw cold water on notions that the computer industry is due for another big advance and that Apple will be the company that makes it happen.



Blind arrogance
Apple repeatedly insults its own consumers -- so why should we care if the company lives or dies?
By Chris Scott


How Apple can be fixed
It's time to join the PC world and make the Mac the universe's most compatible computer.
By Wes Simonds



Print story


E-mail story


View Salon privately with SafeWeb


It's common knowledge among fans of Christmas and ketchup that waiting for the good stuff is half the fun. But after too lengthy a period of waiting, we begin to doubt that the delivery will be made and begin to resent the thing we wanted, as if the ketchup had solidified in the bottle. Eventually we stop shaking and tapping and just eat the hamburger plain.

Mac fans used to enjoy waiting for the Next Big Thing because they were almost always rewarded. In the '80s and early '90s, what the Mac delivered really was big. In fact, with the exception of the Internet, what Mac came up with constitutes the modern conception of "what computers do." Revolutionary trends invented or first capitalized on by Apple during this period include the graphical user interface, networking, plug and play, 3.5-inch floppies, CD-ROM drives, digital imaging, digital video and laser printers.

And that's just a start. This proliferation of paradigm shifts seemed as if it would continue forever at a constant or even increasing rate. But of course the pace of change for the better in the computer world had to slow, as it has in every new industry before it. Just because personal computers sprang seemingly from nowhere into the forefront of pop culture does not mean they are exempt from the same cycle as every previous miraculous technology, from flint arrowheads to blow-dryers.

The dynamic at work is a simple one. Inventors mostly refine previous ideas by building the proverbial better mousetrap. But every once in a while, when the time and place are just right, they see the need for a mousetrap in the first place while everyone else just puts out some grain at night to keep the mice from climbing into their shoes. This second kind of invention doesn't simply improve on processes we are already familiar with, but creates entirely new ways of doing things or entirely new things to do. And because the invention is new, there are usually immediately obvious ways to make large improvements upon it that turbocharge its early development. Gradually the refinements become less and less exciting -- certain users may even perceive them as backward steps.

Which brings us back to Apple, the arguably deserving poster child of innovation in the realm of the PC. The advancements that Apple created or adopted in the '80s were so important to the computer industry that it became axiomatic that some company, probably Apple, would periodically continue these great leaps forward. Given the quantum leap from typing lengthy, arcane commands to selecting sensible actions from a pull-down menu, anticipation was high as to what would come next. Mac lovers settled in with popcorn, eager to witness the next quantum leap in the relationship between man and machine, while DOS/Windows users were just happy that they could use their cheap PC as a cash register and a payroll system.

. Next page | The computer business is growing up
1, 2




Illustration by Jennifer Ormerod/Salon.com


 



Don't get sunburned! Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




Extra goodies and great services in
Salon Plus

____
 



 
 
____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • Is the Airbus a lemon? Two Airbus crashes in two months: Should we worry? Plus: Welcome to the Six Continent Club!
    By Patrick Smith
  • Some stories just won't fly I'd love to move on from the Air France crash, but the media insist on getting things wrong again
    By Patrick Smith
  • When a pilot dies mid-flight Are passengers at risk? Plus: Plenty of flotsam and jetsam, but no real answers in Air France crash
    By Patrick Smith
  • Flight 447's perfect storm The media loves the "wrong speed" theory, but a lightning strike and electrical failure are more likely culprits.
    By Patrick Smith
  •  

    shim shim shim shim shim shim shim
    shim
    shim

    The Free Software Project
    Read Andrew Leonard's book-in-progress on Linux and open source -- and post your comments.

    shim
    shim



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Tech & Business and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright 2005 Salon.com


    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy