Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

 
 

Salon.com
[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Comics ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ][ Audio ]

Article Finder
Technology


 


tech


The day I killed my dot-com
The dismal reality of layoffs can be just as hard on the person who wields the ax as it is on the employees who are fired.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Jennifer Jeffrey

Dec. 12, 2000 | On a Monday morning just five short weeks ago, I had to tell my employees that they didn't have jobs anymore. I felt like a devious conspirator as I walked into the office that day. The sun seemed overly bright, streaming through the windows and giving the place a cheerful air that was altogether inappropriate for what was about to take place.

There had been an argument the previous week between me and my two co-founders as to when we should break the news. I voted for Friday and they for Monday.




Print story


E-mail story


View Salon privately with SafeWeb


"Never tell people on a Friday," they said. "It doesn't do them any good; they'll have a horrible weekend. If we tell them on Monday, then they have a fresh week in front of them to look for new jobs."

So our erstwhile employees were spared the horrible weekend, but I was not. The reality of what was happening to the company that I had worked 18 long months to build was finally sinking in. Our ambitious plans to change the ways in which people communicate online were not to be completed. They were thwarted, halted, aborted. I never thought that my company would be one of the unlucky ones; I was convinced that we were strong enough to withstand the backlash of dot-com paranoia and vanishing investors. I was wrong.

I lay awake at night, rehearsing the phrases we would use:

"As you know, we've been working on raising Series B funding for a couple of months now."

"Due to the horrible market conditions and the fact that we aren't at revenue yet, we haven't been able to raise the money needed to keep the company operating."

"We can't make the next pay period, so off you go."

I agonized over what the employees' reactions would be. I feared tears, outbursts of anger, accusations of leadership gone awry. I had watched the TV interviews with disgruntled employees of failed start-ups. I had read the message board postings of those freshly ejected from flailing new-economy businesses.

The disillusioned are not a happy bunch: They hiss about inexperienced management, worthless stock options and too much overtime. They're bitter because the rainbow they followed didn't lead to a pot of gold and now they have to retype their résumés and hit the road. They inevitably recall the job offer they should have accepted instead -- with a company whose IPO looked like a shoo-in.

They don't tell the interviewer about the Free Lunch Fridays, the fat health benefits or the liberal expense accounts. They fail to mention how seriously their input was valued and the myriad ways in which their ideas were empowered. Instead, they bellow and blame, anxious to share with the world how they've been wronged.

Vivid speculations abound as to what happens after a start-up closes. Rumors are spread about CEOs who get golden parachutes and entrepreneurs who leave with pocketfuls of cash. The laid-off worker imagines a scene in which the founder of a has-been company spins out of the parking lot in a new Porsche, singing "Satisfaction" and planning a vacation to the coast of Spain.

And so it was with great trepidation that I faced that Monday morning in October.

. Next page | No Wired magazine, no revolution, no house in the South of France
1, 2, 3




Illustration by Bob Watts/Salon.com


 



Don't get sunburned! Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




More great offers in
Salon Plus

____
 



 
 
____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • Some stories just won't fly I'd love to move on from the Air France crash, but the media insist on getting things wrong again
    By Patrick Smith
  • When a pilot dies mid-flight Are passengers at risk? Plus: Plenty of flotsam and jetsam, but no real answers in Air France crash
    By Patrick Smith
  • Flight 447's perfect storm The media loves the "wrong speed" theory, but a lightning strike and electrical failure are more likely culprits.
    By Patrick Smith
  • Why the Air France plane crashed Flight 447 shouldn't have gone down, but it did. Were normally non-dangerous phenomena the culprits?
    By Patrick Smith
  •  

    shim shim shim shim shim shim shim
    shim
    shim

    The Free Software Project
    Read Andrew Leonard's book-in-progress on Linux and open source -- and post your comments.

    shim
    shim



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Tech & Business and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright 2005 Salon.com


    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy