Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

Salon.com

[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Business ][ Comics ][ Health & Body ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ]

Article Finder
Technology


 

So you wanna be a dot-com star | 1, 2, 3


But beyond the occasional PR boost from having a star hype your site, does anyone really care that Griffith or Crawford or Jackson are partners in start-ups? Does that Hollywood-style celebrity aura really mean that much to the online masses? Perhaps a good gauge would be this: Have you been hearing much buzz about OneWorldLive or HollywoodTickets or WhatsHotNow or BabyStyle?

While there are plenty of people in the industry who seem to believe in the draw of star power (many of whom, perhaps not coincidentally, come from Hollywood), there is another school of thought that says that the Net isn't very much interested in stars at all.




Print story


E-mail story


Backflip This Story  Backflip this story to find it again


Atom Films, in fact, has made a conscious choice not to pander to celebrity-driven content -- simply because its executives don't think online audiences care about that kind of thing. The star-studded short films it has acquired -- which feature names like Neve Campbell, Cate Blanchett, Matthew McConaughey and George Clooney -- haven't proven nearly as popular as the site's Bikini Bandit series (featuring scantily clad women with big guns), or the animated shorts by "Chicken Run" creators Aardman Animations or the Joe Cartoon clips where you get to mutilate gerbils.

"Certainly there's an audience that always goes to see Julia Roberts. That will always be true," explains Matt Hulett, chief online officer of Atom Films. "We'll be doing things with stars, but our focus is to not do traditional Hollywood content. We're getting 3 million streams that don't have anything to do with celebrity content -- that's all on-demand content that doesn't have a lot of star power."

Perhaps it's a disconnect between the Hollywood Way and the Internet Way. Consider, for example, the process that you have to go through just to get in touch with a Hollywood celebrity who is "going online." You'll have to call both her agents and publicists, neither of whom you'll actually speak to (they are consistently "on conference calls," their assistants will tell you); your phone calls will go ignored and unanswered. If, by the grace of God, a publicist does deign to respond, you'll typically be informed that the celebrity doesn't speak to the press, though they might answer e-mail. E-mails will then be vetted through public relations officers (God forbid you be given their actual e-mail address), and the chances are quite high that you'll never get any kind of a response at all.

It's a far cry from the rough-and-tumble realm of the Net, where interactivity is critical and no one who "gets it" is ever more than an e-mail away. Although the Net has produced few real celebrities, the stars of the Net -- Mahir the Turkish stud, Jenni Ringley of JenniCam, the "most downloaded" cyberbabe Cindy Margolis, Harry Knowles of Ain't It Cool News -- all share a certain closeness to their fans. They maintain their own Web sites, host chats, offer live "cams" and generally respond personally to fan e-mails or reporters' calls.

So, which would online fans rather do: stare at a static page with information about Griffith's personal trainer or an advice column from Crawford that answers one question once a week or participate in an online chat with a dynamic Net personality? There's a good reason why JenniCam is so popular that she had to charge subscription fees to members just to pay her bandwidth costs and OneWorldLive is merely a blip on our Net-celebrity radar. Fans online want stars to come down to their level.

Fried explains it aptly: "What people online want is choice, and a voice and interactivity. Hollywood is generally a closed environment -- if you drove up to a movie studio the first thing you notice is a big wall. It's a closed in environment, not inherently used to interacting with people. It's a community that has a way of telling, or providing entertainment," he says. "The Net is interactive, and interactivity is different than the traditional entertainment Hollywood is used to creating."

There are some stars who do recognize that communication is key in this medium. Chuck D, for example, started his online company Rapstation.com as a power-to-the-people endeavor, and is out on the Net trying to convert listeners to his down-with-the-labels gospel. Courtney Love similarly maintains her own Web site with the help of a 19-year-old webmistress, engaging in daily chats with her fans and posting ad-hoc photos of herself chumming around with her friends. Her Web site, Holemusic.com, is popular partly because she will do things like post unauthorized photos from her upcoming movie "Julie Johnson" without first getting permission from the hierarchy of promotions and marketing executives -- an action that recently sent the film's publicist into convulsions.

"I think that there's 'official channels' that you're supposed to go through: the Official Celebrity Channel," explains Love. "But I think those official channels have to do with old-school marketing and a subscription to big media, as well as furthering one's 'mystique' and creating a bigger lie of a persona. I think celebrity culture is about to have a nervous breakdown and I'd love to help it along."

Are the celebrities coming to the Net willing to dismantle those walls, get their hands really dirty in the day-to-day of a dot-com, or even, yes, publish their e-mail addresses so that the madding crowd can get in touch? The pedestals that keep fans at a safe distance aren't relevant online, where e-mail and chat rooms replace red carpet and television cameras. The celebrity dot-com is just another boring dot-com unless the star chooses to get down with those fans and evangelize interactively.

And that it seems, will take a long, long time to change. It's hard to imagine Melanie and Michael and Pam sending midnight e-mails to their fans and uploading snapshots of their cat. "Would Julia Roberts do this?" Love ponders. "No. Not now. But she should."


salon.com | July 21, 2000

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Janelle Brown is a senior writer for Salon Technology.

Sound Off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

Related stories
Silicon Valley's pinup boys
Silicon Valley venture capitalists and start-up founders strike poses for GQ -- and they're sporting Dockers!
By Katharine Mieszkowski
05/03/00

Courtney Love does the math
The controversial singer takes on record label profits, Napster, "sucka VCs" and talks about her role as a waiter in the new economy.
By Courtney Love
06/14/00

Viva Net glam!
Even drag queens are getting rich off dot-com mania as RuPaul becomes the latest Internet celebrity spokesperson.
By Janelle Brown
12/08/99

Pop chart
Ricky Martin? Pamela Anderson? Britney Spears? Who rules the list of celebrity searches on Lycos? The new Lycos 50 compiles the most searched terms and asks readers to help figure out what's driving the searches.
By Janelle Brown
09/21/99

Salon.com >> Technology
 


 



Don't get sunburned! Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




More great offers in
Salon Plus

____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • Some stories just won't fly I'd love to move on from the Air France crash, but the media insist on getting things wrong again
    By Patrick Smith
  • When a pilot dies mid-flight Are passengers at risk? Plus: Plenty of flotsam and jetsam, but no real answers in Air France crash
    By Patrick Smith
  • Flight 447's perfect storm The media loves the "wrong speed" theory, but a lightning strike and electrical failure are more likely culprits.
    By Patrick Smith
  • Why the Air France plane crashed Flight 447 shouldn't have gone down, but it did. Were normally non-dangerous phenomena the culprits?
    By Patrick Smith
  •  

    The Free Software Project
    Read Andrew Leonard's book-in-progress on Linux and open source -- and post your comments.



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Business | Comics | Health | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Technology and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright © 2000 Salon.com
    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy