Search Salon

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon Technology

Review
MP3: Here, there, everywhere
The latest digital music players let you play MP3s on your home stereo, in your car or on the run -- but are they any good?
By Janelle Brown
[12/14/99]

Technology: View from the top
High-speed Net access that's out of this world
John Koehler retired from a career at Hughes Electronics and the CIA to build fast Net connections on satellites already in orbit.
By Mark Compton
[12/13/99]

21st Challenge
The perfect e-gift
What should you order online for Bill Clinton or Bill Gates, George W. Bush or Jesse Ventura?
By Charlie Varon and Jim Rosenau
[12/11/99]

Dear Diary
Andrew Smales' astonishing Diaryland site provides the format. You supply the secrets.
By Todd Levin
[12/10/99]

Dot-com dogs
With Net-stock fever showing no signs of cooling, mediocre IPOs are growing as plentiful as fleas on a stray hound.
By Mark Gimein
[12/09/99]

Complete archives for Technology

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

The best of 1999 A complete list of Salon's best picks of the year.

Of course, there was a little more to 1999 than shopping, although many noteworthy events did seem to revolve around money. Here's our take on all that came to pass in the final year of the millennium.

Microsoft is a monopolist

Could there have been any bigger story in the tech world in 1999 than Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's definitive declaration on Nov. 6 that Microsoft is a monopoly? Not likely, although Jackson's stronger-than-expected denunciation of Microsoft was considerably watered down just a few weeks later, when he appointed a noted foe of antitrust enforcement, Judge Richard Posner, as a mediator between Bill Gates and the Department of Justice. Even so, Jackson's 200-plus-page learned treatise on Microsoft, the software industry and the game of monopoly proved that the judge really was paying attention to the interminable hearings that have had Wall Street analysts and technology reporters gnashing their teeth for what now feels like a couple of decades. In devastating detail, Jackson set forth an analysis of Microsoft's competitive practices that could only have seemed like a very, very bad dream for Redmond, Wash., lawyers. Still, we're far from closure on this story. Will the two sides reach a settlement? Will Microsoft actually be broken up? Or, worst of all for the Lords of Windows, will the company be forced to give up its all important source code to the greedy scrutiny of the general public and a host of salivating competitors? Check our wrap-up for 2000 -- there's an outside chance we might know the answers to these questions by then.

Dot-com mania

We may be stating the obvious, but Internet mania this year reached ludicrous heights. Venture capitalists disbursed a boggling $9.67 billion to thousands of Internet start-ups in 1999, and the resultingly flush marketing budgets led to an absurd array of pricey TV ad campaigns -- $2 billion worth of indistinguishable ads, according to some estimates. By mid-year, you could not watch a sitcom, or even pick up a copy of the New Yorker, without being solicited to visit some site you'd never heard of. As the venture capital trickled down (or would that be up?), celebrities, including drag diva RuPaul, made out like bandits as, um, spokespersons for the identity-desperate dot-coms. Even technology journalists were invited to share the wealth -- through a deluge of unbidden PR gifts.

Other consequences: Every news magazine is dedicating half of its coverage to what has been dubbed Riches.com, and wannabe boy billionaires are flocking to Silicon Valley in droves. Worst of all for locals, the cost of living in the San Francisco Bay Area has skyrocketed while, some say, the quality of life has plummeted.

Next page | Red Hat is red hot and the Dow's on fire