Navigation Salon Salon Technology email print
Arts & Entertainment
Books
Comics
Health & Body
Media
Mothers Who Think
News
People
Politics2000
.Technology
- Free Software Project
Travel & Food
_______
Columnists

 

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

View From the Top

Full list of profiles

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Also Today

For a full list of today's Salon Technology stories, go to the Technology home page.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Salon Columnists
Follow these links for the most recent column by:
Susie Bright
Robert Burton, M.D.
Joe Conason
Sean Elder
David Horowitz
Garrison Keillor
Anne Lamott
Greil Marcus
Joyce Millman
Camille Paglia
Amy Reiter
Mary Roach
Scott Rosenberg
Ruth Shalit
Michael Sragow
Virginia Vitzthum
Sarah Vowell
Cintra Wilson
Burt Wolf

+ Columnists' schedule

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon Technology


Singing the MP3 blues
Indie musicians find online music distributors every bit as greedy as the recording industry they aim to replace.

By Emily Vander Veer
[12/02/99]


Sex sells, doesn't it?
Tales of financial chaos at the heart of an online porn empire.

By Mark Gimein
[12/01/99]

Technology: View from the top
The music man
MTVi's Nicholas Butterworth says he wants the audience to do the programming.

By Janelle Brown
[11/29/99]


The man who fell to mirth
David Bowie makes light of van Gogh's ear, Ziggy's future and sowing "creative wild oats" in a chat about Omikron.

By Janelle Brown
[11/24/99]

Review
A soul-sucking parallel world
Will you free the residents of Omikron's totalitarian regime or lose yourself in the beauty of this game's futuristic city?

By Janelle Brown
[11/24/99]

Complete archives for Technology

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Technology
by e-mail
Sign up here to receive our weekly e-mail newsletter listing recent and upcoming articles and events in Technology.

 
Unsubscribe

- - - - - - - - - - - -




See spot run | page 1, 2

The flow of venture capital into Internet companies is torrential today; one industry survey pegs it at $5 billion in the third quarter of 1999 alone. With that much money chasing a fixed quantity of novel ideas, managerial talent and human ingenuity, an inevitable decline in the quality of companies and business models sets in, and duplication runs rampant. Thus the pileups of overlapping niche businesses, like the half-dozen new pet-related e-commerce companies out there, or the multiple golf portals and toy emporiums, or the many competing "Webtop" Web-based personal-organizer firms.

This is, as speakers at an Industry Standard conference last summer dubbed it, an "era of permissive capital." The offspring of permissive financial parents tend to lack self-control; they want instant gratification. (Their VC parents often want it, too, in the form of fast returns.) The life plan all these companies have adopted is an accelerated version of the one the Silicon Valley venture capital world pioneered for technology companies: Fund a start-up, bring a product to market fast (18 months in the old days, six months or so today), see if it sells, and then cash in if it's a success and bail out if it's a flop.

That model made sense for chip innovators, game developers and storage-device manufacturers. The trouble is, it is now being applied to Internet ventures that are, at heart, media companies or retail firms that happen to be doing business online. And building a following for an online store or a Web portal or a content site isn't a single roll of the dice; it's a game that needs to play out over many seasons.

A site's traffic rarely soars overnight. Most successful Web sites find that their number of visitors and volume of pages viewed grow over time, as Internet users spread the word, links multiply across the Web, URLs circulate on mailing lists, and so forth. Overnight sensations do happen, of course -- like the Hamster Dance, or Mahir the Turkish accordion player. But sustainable long-term online businesses take time to grow; their life trajectories are snowballs, not skyrockets.

Today's start-ups, though, lack the patience to wait for their businesses to grow organically. Some are spooked by the idea of an Internet "land grab," in which he who spends the most first supposedly walks off with the spoils. Some are prodded by impatient backers looking for the shortest distance between first round of investment and IPO cash-out. Many, I think, are simply following the genetic program of the Silicon Valley start-up, which dictates fast results or death.

The CEO and the board of, say, Ecommerce4U.com look at the disappointing traffic figures for the site they've just launched. They look at the money they have in the bank. They think, "How can we get large numbers of people to our site, fast?" Their eyes drift to the TV set in the conference-room corner. "AS SEEN ON TV" -- bingo!

Too bad for Ecommerce4U.com that the exact same sequence of events is simultaneously taking place in the offices of dozens of its competitors. And too bad for all of them that TV ads are neither the most cost-effective nor the most efficient tool for attracting Web users.

Venture capital pooh-bah John Doerr, of the pioneering VC firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, is widely quoted describing Silicon Valley as "the single greatest legal creation of wealth in the history of the planet." But what's happening this winter is more like the single greatest legal transfer of wealth from venture capitalists' pockets to media corporations' coffers in the history of the planet. In this transaction, the Internet firms are mere middlemen, passing the cash along.

For now, the TV networks, radio stations and Internet-ad-fattened magazines and newspapers are laughing their way to the bank. But their glee will be short-lived: This madness is a one-time, self-limiting epidemic. The online store that plans a $20 million TV campaign when it has only $10 million in its kitty is a likely victim. But as the craziness kills off the weakest of the Internet litter, it will leave the survivors stronger, smarter -- and a lot less likely to blow their budgets on TV ads next year.
salon.com | Dec. 3, 1999

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Scott Rosenberg is Salon's managing editor. For more columns by Rosenberg, visit his column archive.

Sound off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

Send e-mail to Scott Rosenberg

Related Salon stories
Reading, writing, quarterly results In Silicon Valley, venture capital has become a required subject -- even for fourth graders.
By Mark Gimein 10/13/99

Boom or bubble? Net honchos don't know whether it's the best or the worst of times -- but they're hiring and "monetizing" too fast to worry.
By Scott Rosenberg 07/23/99

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Print this story  Get a printer-friendly version

Email this story  E-mail a friend about this article

Backflip This Story  Backflip this article to find it again

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

 

Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.