Search Salon

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Salon Columnists
Follow these links for the most recent column by:
Susie Bright
Robert Burton, M.D.
Joe Conason
Sean Elder
David Horowitz
Garrison Keillor
Anne Lamott
Greil Marcus
Joyce Millman
Camille Paglia
Amy Reiter
Mary Roach
Scott Rosenberg
Ruth Shalit
Michael Sragow
Virginia Vitzthum
Sarah Vowell
Cintra Wilson
Burt Wolf

+ Columnists' schedule

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon People

Nothing Personal
Rearview window
Katie Couric exposes innermost self, Matt Lauer learns more than he'd like; Gwyneth Paltrow pulls a Halle Berry; Matt Damon and Winona Ryder say bye-bye.
By Amy Reiter
[04/26/00]

Nothing Personal
One bad mutha
Who's the movie star that's nasty and abusive to all the crew? Samuel L. Jackson, damn right. Plus: Natalie Portman on trailer-park culture, Sofia Coppola on what's in a name and Hugh Hefner's girlfriend on "Baywatch Hawaii."
By Amy Reiter
[04/25/00]

Brilliant Careers
Robert Moog
His invention had an extraordinary impact on how musicians create, and radically changed the way music is made.
By Frank Houston
[04/25/00]

People Feature
The art of crime
Ex-con and man of letters Edward Bunker discusses his new memoir, "Education of a Felon," and life as an upstanding citizen.
By Stephen Lemons
[04/24/00]

People Feature
Living in shimmering disequilibrium
The Pulitzer Prize-winning author calls for spiritualizing the environmental movement as Earth endures the greatest mass extinction in 65 million years.
By Fred Branfman
[04/22/00]

Complete archives for People

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

The impressively articulate Nader endorsed a "pro-democracy agenda." OK, Mr. Nader, if you can convince me that even as you condemn corporate abuses, you recognize the enormous contributions made by capitalism to modern life, you'll get my vote this fall. Why? Because I cannot stand the slick games and endless lies of the Hollywood-ass-kissing Clinton-Gore administration (which I voted for twice). The Democratic Party needs to recover its Hubert Humphrey-era populism, and perhaps only shock tactics -- like the election of a Republican president -- will work.

Apropos of the latter, many readers are complaining about my repeated references to Gov. George W. Bush's woeful lack of preparation for the presidency. Derek Copold, for example, warns:

Camille Paglia Camille Paglia's column appears in Salon People every third Wednesday. + Biography + Archives

I'm telling you not to underestimate Bush. There are political corpses all over Austin of people who thought he was "unprepared." This guy has steel behind his smile.

When he assumed office after defeating Ann Richards, Bush was faced with a full slate of executive offices filled with Democrats, and both chambers of the legislature were filled with Democratic senators and representatives. We Texans thought that the state was headed for yet more legislative gridlock.

The governor before Ann Richards, William Clements, a Republican, was crotchety, egocentric and disconnected. Ann Richards, it was thought, would be able to work with her fellow Democrats, but she adopted a high-handed attitude toward her lessers as she fell in love with the image the media painted of her as the queen of Texas.

Bills stalled, reforms were delayed and the system decayed. Highways were a mess, education a disaster and taxes increased. It was really not all that surprising that Ann Richards was sent packing along with several Democratic legislators in the sweep of '94.

When W. took office, things changed. He met with legislators, justices and executive officers. Ann Richards had never bothered to meet with her own party's representatives. George W. not only met them, he remembered their names and their proposals. Amazingly, work was done. Bills were passed, and reform began, and even the state Capitol was restored after excess delay.

Like an intelligent quarterback, Bush relied on a series of short yardage gains, with an occasional screen, to carry him forward to the goal line. Given the circumstances in Austin, Gov. Bush made a horrible situation far better than he found it, and he laid the groundwork for future improvement. In 1998, W. garnered an unprecedented 69 percent of the popular vote.

I know that he is young, but George W. has clearly demonstrated that he has the most important qualification for the presidency: He knows that he is mortal. He is willing to listen to his advisors, and he will listen and learn from his opponents. He can prioritize his objectives and sacrifice short-term goals for a long-term victory. George W. may not be perfect, but then again what candidate is? He is clearly far more preferable to the disgusting and amoral Al Gore.

Also, considering the battering the office of the presidency has taken under the Clintons, the office needs a man who can restore confidence. What better person than the same man who restored confidence in the Texas government, a government that had before enjoyed an unbroken, century-long reputation as irredeemably corrupt?

Thank you for your remarks, Mr. Copold. They are particularly revelatory about Ann Richards, whom I've always celebrated for her feisty persona. Yes, we must be wary about how image is magnified or distorted by the media. L. Duncan Vinson sends this protest from Providence, R.I.:

Are you fed up with the media's constant harping on George W. Bush's supposed anti-Catholic views, as demonstrated by his willingness to speak at Bob Jones University?

If you want to find anti-Catholic views, go no further than the mainstream media or the liberal universities, where you will find them in abundance. Especially in discussions about abortion and gay rights, American liberal culture has no qualms at all about portraying the Catholic church as a medieval organization for sexually repressed troglodytes.

And in the universities, not only are Catholics a safe target under the p.c. regime, but p.c. actually seems to have encouraged Catholic-bashing.

You're quite right, Mr. Vinson. I have repeatedly denounced the overt anti-Catholicism of the liberal establishment -- of which a good example was the mounting of a dung-and-porn-bedecked painting of the Madonna as the sole religious image in last fall's "Sensation" show at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. Needless to say, a dung-and-porn-bedecked Torah scroll, even if part of a foreign collection, would never have seen the light of day in a major American museum.

Next page | A close encounter with George W. and Laura Bush