| |||
|
Arts & Entertainment Books Comics Health & Body Media Mothers Who Think People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Travel & Food ![]() Columnists
Current Click here to read the latest stories from the wires. - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - Also Today For a full list of today's Salon News stories, go to the
News home page. - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon News
Arianna Huffington is dead wrong
Adios to all that
A GOP rebel in Dixie
Columbine High School shut down
Bush and McCain go head-to-head - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
To the moon, Al
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Dec. 18, 1999 | NASHUA, N.H. --
Then there were other times when you felt like you were eavesdropping on the incessant bickering of an old,
unhappily married couple. When the two would scrap
-- interrupting one another and disputing facts and figures, having
fights that seemed decades old -- Gore recalled a nagging shrew,
Bradley his exasperated spouse long resigned to misery and seething. On the whole, the second debate, held at Daniel Webster College,
hosted by ABC's "Nightline," and moderated by the inimitable Ted
Koppel, was a fairly accurate representation of the campaigns they've
been waging for the White House -- and occasionally against each
other. Gore, who in his bygone days as an unquestioned front-runner
seemed physically unable to pour the name "Bradley" from his lips,
has seen his candidacy challenged by Bradley's fund-raising and
laconic appeal -- especially here in New Hampshire where Bradley and
Gore are neck and neck, according to polls. A lot has gone down since the two last shared a stage at
Dartmouth College on Oct. 27. Most notably Gore has gone on a
direct and often misleading attack against Bradley's 10-year, $650
billion health-care plan. Whether claiming that Bradley's plan would
deprive health care for poor people, seniors, the disabled; sending snarky e-mails to Bradley challenging him to name the
funding source for future Medicare funds; or calling Bradley's
proposed $150 health care subsidy an inadequate "voucher," Gore has
been hammering away, leaving Bradley and his followers flummoxed and
more than a tad resentful. "Gore wonders why his disapproval ratings are so high," one Bradley
supporter groused earlier in the day. "Why doesn't anyone like him?
It's pretty simple: He's a jerk." The first chunk of the debate was far removed from such ugliness.
Koppel threw a self-described softball about what kinds of first
ladies Tipper Gore and Ernestine Schlant Bradley would be. Guess
what? They'd both be super! Bradley said his wife was "a unique human being"; Gore said that
Tipper's works include "seek(ing) out homeless under bridges and in
alleyways" -- presumably not just to put warning stickers on their
Frank Zappa albums. The first question from the audience was sensible enough, asking why
any sane person would want to run for president with all the media
intrusions into candidates' personal lives. Bradley replied that he was running to promote health care, racial
unity and campaign finance reform, and to reduce the number of
children in poverty and guns in the wrong hands. Gore rattled off a
similar list -- universal health care, environmental clean-up, gun
control -- adding his new catch phrase that he wants "to fight for
you." (In the past few weeks, Gore has tried to capitalize on his feistiness, going so far as to replace the tag line of his biographical TV
from the clunky "change that works for working families" to "I want
to fight for you.") In one of many sardonic asides, Koppel made sure the crowd noticed
"how skillful (Gore and Bradley) are at beginning with your question
and ending with what they want to talk about." | ||
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.