salon premiumfind out morelog in
Salon.com
SubscribeSalon.com

[ News & Politics ][ Opinion ][ Tech & Business ][ Arts & Entertainment ][ Books ][ Life ][ Sex ][ Comics ][ Audio ][ Dialogue ]

Article Finder
Salon News


 

Why gays shouldn't serve | 1, 2, 3


As a comeback, some may be tempted to ask: What about the fact that women now serve in combat units? Far from taking care of the problem, this comparison only underscores the dangers in letting politicians treat the military as a social experiment. In one sense, of course, we don't really know the magnitude of the threat since we haven't been in a ground war since women were allowed in combat roles. (And there may, indeed, be a connection between the two.) But we do know that every military that has attempted to place women in combat positions -- the Israelis, the Germans and the Russians provide three examples -- has abandoned the practice, because of its negative impact on unit cohesion. (In part, because men will instinctively sacrifice their tactical missions to protect the women.) We do know that since women have been included in these roles, requirements and standards have been dramatically lowered, and along with them morale -- a crucial, if immeasurable, element of military success.

Moreover, we know that once the politically correct foot is in the door, the possibility of reasserting pragmatic controls becomes ever more remote. The same "progressive" intolerance that forced the original issue will prevent any rational assessment of the result. The admission of women into the American military was not a military decision but a political act. The Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces, which was created during Bush père's administration, recommended against putting women in combat positions.

The Clinton administration ignored the recommendation and slipped the new policy into place without a public discussion or congressional debate. During the Gulf War, women in the armed services failed to report to combat duty at rates many multiples that of men. When you don't show up for your combat assignment you are effectively sabotaging existing battle plans. On one ship, the Aurora, 10 percent of the women en route to the war zone got pregnant. The military looked the other way. None was court-martialed for cowardice or dereliction of duty. In other words, under the force of political correctness, the military has surrendered to the fact that it will be a less effective fighting machine.

The integration of women in the military and in combat forces is a politically created debacle that has already weakened America's defenses. The open inclusion of gays in the military could have an even more damaging effect, with unknown consequences for untold lives. If proponents of gay inclusion want to make their case persuasively, they need to make it not on the battlefields of political correctness, but here in the real world.


Note: A correction to this story has been published.


salon.com


printe-mail

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
David Horowitz is a Salon columnist. For more articles by and about Horowitz, visit his archive.

Sound Off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

Related stories
Should gays serve?
A Salon panel debates the ban on homosexuals in the military.
By Daryl Lindsey
06/09/00

The Cost of the Closet
A Salon special report examines the real-life impact of "don't ask, don't tell."
By Daryl Lindsey
06/06/00

Salon.com >> News
 


 
shim
shim

Salon Politics: Unflinching daily political news, analysis and commentary.

shim
shim



Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


News & Politics | Opinion | Tech & Business | Arts & Entertainment
Indie film | Books | Life | Sex | Comics | Audio | Dialogue
Letters | Columnists | Salon Gear


Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
Copyright 2005 Salon.com


Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service