Navigation Salon Salon's Mothers
Who Think email print
Arts & Entertainment
Books
Comics
Health & Body
Media
.Mothers Who Think
News
People
Politics2000
Technology
- Free Software Project
Travel & Food
_______
Columnists

 

Current
Wire Stories

Click here to read the latest stories from the wires.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Also Today

For a full list of today's Salon Mothers Who Think stories, go to the Mothers Who Think home page.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon Mothers Who Think


Abortions are down and everybody wants credit
The real news is that access to medical abortion doesn't increase the overall rate.

By Elissa Keeler Miller
[01/13/00]


In all the hoo-ha about Elian we have forgotten the Smalls!
Who could forget those darling fugitives from Canadian cultural protectionism?

By Dorothy Nixon
[01/14/00]


A match made in Graceland
He wore white patent leather shoes and I still married him.

By Carol Ormandy
[01/18/00]


A Fisch by any other name
My last name is Fisch. My husband's last name is Flynn. Our son's last name is Flysch. No, it's not a spelling error.

By Audrey Fisch
[01/20/00]


Why should a baby get the father's last name?
Historians, scientists and legal scholars offer some explanation.

By Carol Lloyd
[01/20/00]

Complete archives for Mothers Who Think

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Mothers Who Think
by e-mail
Sign up here to receive our weekly e-mail newsletter listing recent and upcoming articles and events in Mothers Who Think.

 
Unsubscribe

- - - - - - - - - - - -




A new year and a new spouse | page 1, 2

All this has been reason enough for church leaders to predict -- for the umpteenth time -- the imminent demise of the nuclear family in Britain.

Meanwhile, the marriage experts are left scrambling for an explanation as to why so many Britons seem to be so eager to resolve their marital problems with divorce.

To explain the millennial madness, some experts speculate that people had given their partners an ultimatum: Shape up by Jan. 1, or this marriage is over. When their spouses didn't reform, they dumped them.

Others argue that the divorce wave is a knee-jerk reaction to family problems over the holidays, a time of year that's known for draining one's emotions and finances.

"Many couples wanted to hang on for the holidays -- especially because they were such a big deal this year -- for the sake of the children," said Andrew Price, a divorce lawyer in Paignton, south of London, who's also noticed an increase in calls to his office this month. "All those days of forced frivolity really got to lots of people and so they were more than ready to seek a divorce once January arrived."

But in the end, experts place most of the blame at the feet of the media, who, they say, raised couples' expectations for the new millennium to unrealistic levels.

"A lot of people expected New Year's Eve to be the best night of their lives. When it wasn't, they blamed their partners and decided to start over again," said Lucy Selleck, a counselor with Relate, Britain's largest counseling agency for couples with 100 offices across the country.

Many of those offices have seen a rise in calls since Jan. 1. The office in Portsmouth, for example, took 57 calls on the first day of the year -- more than twice the number recorded last year.

"People's gut reaction is always to get rid of what they don't like, but really we think people should work on their relationships and not go straight for a divorce," Selleck said.

Meanwhile, church leaders say that they've been disappointed to see that Britons continue to be obsessed with Ferris wheels and the Millennium Dome, while they seem hesitant to engage in a discussion of serious issues -- such as the collapse of the stable family in Britain.

Consider the statistics: There were 279,000 weddings in 1996, compared with 348,000 a decade earlier -- a 20 percent decline. The most dramatic fall -- 27 percent -- was among couples marrying for the first time, down to 161,000 from 220,000 in 1986.

The declining marriage rate can be attributed, in part, to more couples choosing to live together outside of marriage. The government predicts the number of unmarried cohabiting couples -- now about 1.5 million -- will nearly double over the next 25 years.

At the same time, the number of divorces -- which had fallen since peaking at 165,018 in 1993 -- is back on the rise. Two in five marriages are now expected to end in divorce, although the rate is projected to climb to one in two by year's end.

"Family breakdown is to our social ecology what global warming is to our natural ecology," said Dr. Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth.

The church has greeted the rise in divorce rates with new programs to promote family life. Some of their tactics have been decidedly quirky -- such as conducting marriage and parenting courses for men in pubs. (They presume that the pub provides a more comfortable atmosphere than, say, a church hall.)

The church also has urged the British government to cut taxes for families, to give couples a financial incentive to get -- and stay -- married. Currently, those couples who live together have little to gain financially by getting hitched.

Ironically, the millennium seems to have had a very different effect on the marriage rate in other European countries. In France, for example, the institution of marriage is more popular now than at any time since the 1970s with 400,000 weddings expected there this year -- compared with 280,000 in 1999. And, although France already has one of the lowest rates of divorce in Europe -- almost half that of England -- the number of divorces is falling for the first time in 10 years.

But back in the United States, Sollee predicts the year 2000 will not only be a boom time for divorces, but, eventually, for weddings as well.

"A lot of people who have been living together for 10 years think it could be jazzy to get married in the year 2000," she said.

But will it be enough to reverse the long-term trends? Probably not.

In Britain, Vanessa Lloyd Platts may have summed up the modern relationship best when she said: "Some people wanted to rush out and get divorced before the millennium. And, obviously, lots of people have decided to get divorced now that the millennium is here. People these days are always looking for an excuse to get out of a relationship and to search for something better."
salon.com | Jan. 21, 2000

 

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Shelley Emling is a freelance writer in London.

Table Talk
D-I-V-O-R-C-E How much should you shield your kids from a marital meltdown?

Sound off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

Related Salon stories
Whither marriage? For a week, Mothers Who Think examines the battered but unbowed institution of marriage.
11/16/99

High noon for nurturers Penelope Leach faces off with the Ezzos in a nasty turf war. Someone needs a spanking.
By Shelley Emling 10/26/99

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Print this story  Get a printer-friendly version

Email this story  E-mail a friend about this article

Backflip This Story  Backflip this article to find it again

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.