Search Salon

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon Mothers Who Think

Trapped and torn
Locked in by a chain of protesters, I wanted to kick myself. My kids were at home and I was about to be pummeled for all the wrong reasons.
By Lisa Guide
[12/03/99]

Wild in the streets
What better place to find a hottie than at a riot conveniently taking place in my neighborhood?
By Annie Culver
[12/03/99]

Taking a chance on love
Suddenly, we would be allowed to adopt a baby -- if we could accept the very real possibility that, one day, he would be mentally ill.
By Jane Smith
[12/01/99]

Giving in to Ritalin
I hate it, but my son needs it.
By Karen Shoemaker
[11/30/99]

Till death do us part
Is it a promise of love or a life sentence? Our readers weigh in with advice.
By Jennifer Foote Sweeney and Amy Benfer
[11/29/99]

Complete archives for Mothers Who Think

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

When parents and teenagers do come together, they are often both unaware of their options. What's been characterized by health professionals as a "dramatic lack of information" about prevention and contraception has prompted education minister Royal, in conjunction with family planning and related associations, to prepare an aggressive nationwide sex education campaign for mid-January.

Previous campaigns, which focused on the use of condoms and which were largely oriented around the prevention of AIDS, have been seen as failures. This new campaign -- to be launched in schools, on metros and in other public places as well as on TV, radio and in the press -- will provide adolescents with the information they need for contraception, consultation and emergency intervention. Five million copies of a contraception guide will also be distributed in junior high and high schools with accompanying letters to parents.

"Contraception and control of our bodies is a right," says education minister Ségolène Royal. "We've fought hard for this right and we intend to exercise it. This includes adolescents' rights to contraception. We'll be direct with young teenagers in our campaign. We'll teach them to say 'No' if they're not ready for sexual relations. We'll teach them how to respect their bodies.

"They must learn that sexuality is one of the most beautiful aspects of being human, and that their first steps toward expression of their sexuality as adolescents will inevitably shape their experience as women. If that first experience ends in abortion, it's a failure."

Of the 10,000 unwanted pregnancies last year, 6,700 ended in abortion. Students, as much as Royal and her adult supporters, cite these statistics as the main reason they are in favor of NorLevo in schools.

A small group of girls gathered in front of a school in Nanterre nod enthusiastically as their friend Pauline says she is completely in support of the program. "I've used the morning-after pill myself," adds one girl. "It saved my life." When asked about their personal experiences with abortion, they are reticent. Only one girl offers her own experience at a clinic. "Let's just say it was not a happy experience."

Filloux, also a school nurse, considers NorLevo a last resort, but a critical one. "I can't tell you how many teenage girls come to me in a state of tremendous grief and guilt. They lament that they are going to kill their unborn child. I don't want to hear this anymore."

Doctors on the front line performing abortions also express consistent astonishment at how little many adolescents know about their own bodies, about procreation or contraception. Says Royal, "This lack of education is totally unacceptable in our times. If these kids aren't getting the information they need from parents, and if the school can provide that role, it will."

It is precisely this assertive position that angers parents, many of whom are against the state's involvement in family affairs and resent implications that parental resignation has driven a wedge between them and their children. Counters Royal, "Parents can't ask for more support and social programs in schools and then prevent us from providing their children with the fruits of social progress."

PEEP members see things differently. "We aren't against contraception," says one member. "But we don't want our children getting it in schools. We want a partnership with family planning centers."

This exchange underscores a paradox in France: Of the mere 1,100 family planning centers in the country, 30 percent are in Paris. Annie Costa is a school nurse in the small town of Belmont-de-la-Loire where there is only one pharmacy and the pharmacist, as a result, "knows everyone." The closest family planning center is 60 kilometers away and closed on weekends.

"When a young adolescent comes to us in distress, the first thing we do is encourage her to speak with her parents," says Costa. "But when she absolutely refuses this option, we must respect her. Often a girl will come to us with only a few hours left before NorLevo is no longer a viable option.

"We can't call the paramedics and send her to a hospital. That would also be a flagrant violation of her need for privacy. We suggest NorLevo, but we also provide personal follow-up to assure that she's supported with the people and information she needs."

Education Minister Royal emphasizes this follow-up as part of a protocol currently being defined on a national level.

"We're creating a comprehensive sex education campaign," says Royal. "It will speak to adolescents before and after sexual relations. It's one way of reclaiming ground in the field of sex education, which currently amounts to only 30 hours over a four-year scholastic period. The morning-after pill is not a method of contraception, but a last resort at the end of what we hope will be a more global and effective public health and sex-awareness program."

Royal's decision to allow school nurses to administer the morning-after pill has been applauded by the majority of health practitioners around the country, but it still faces an uphill battle despite France's reputation as a sexually open country.

"This is a false perception," says Le Chevert. "We are a people in contradiction. We are not prude, but we are not direct either. We'll show women's breasts on TV and flaunt a certain amount of sexuality, but when it comes to our children, or to our own private lives, we are extremely closed.

"We are still very much living in a Judeo-Christian culture. We couldn't launch our campaign, for example, until well after Christmas. There was concern that if we did so before the holiday, with its religious underpinnings, we would be communicating the wrong message at the wrong time."
salon.com | Dec. 6, 1999

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

  Get a printer-friendly version

  E-mail a friend about this article

  Backflip this article to find it again

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon