A new collection of unpublished stories betrays the two faces of Shirley Jackson, the writer who created "The Lottery." By JONATHAN LETHEM theres "The Lottery," of course, the story everyone knows
even if they don't remember Shirley Jackson's name. A small New
England town, blandly familiar in every way, sleepwalking its way
through ritual murder. Likely the most controversial piece of
fiction ever published in the New Yorker, resulting in hundreds
of canceled subscriptions, later adapted for television, radio
and ballet, it now resides in the popular imagination as an
archetype. It can be as difficult to persuade readers that the
story is just one sheaf in the portfolio of one of this century's
most luminous and strange American writers as it is to explain that the town portrayed in "The Lottery" is a real one.
I know it is, because I lived there. North Bennington is a
tiny village less than a mile from the otherwise isolated
Bennington campus in Vermont. Shirley Jackson was married to
Stanley Edgar Hyman, a literary critic who taught at the college.
And she spent her life in the town, raising four children,
presiding over a chaotic household that was host to Ralph
Ellison, Bernard Malamud and Howard Nemerov, and at times going
quietly crazy and writing, always, with the rigor of one who has
found her born task. Six novels, two bestselling volumes of
deceptively sunny family memoirs and countless stories before
her death at 48, in 1965.
The town hasn't changed, or at least it hadn't by the mid-
eighties, when I was a student at the school. A handful of the
townspeople portrayed in thin disguise in Jackson's novels and
stories were still around. I knew the square where "The Lottery"
takes place. It was Jackson's fate, as a faculty wife and an
eccentric newcomer in a staid, insular village, to absorb the
reflexive antisemitism and anti-intellectualism felt by the
townspeople toward the college. She and her children were
accessible in a way that her husband and his colleagues and
students, who spent their days on the campus, were not.
Jackson was in many senses already two people when she
arrived in Vermont. One was a turgid, fearful ugly-duckling,
permanently cowed by the severity of her upbringing by a suburban
mother obsessed with appearances. This half of Jackson was a
character she brought brilliantly to life in her stories and
novels from the beginning: the shy girl, whose identity slips all
too easily from its foundations. The other half of Jackson was
the expulsive iconoclast, brought out of her shell by marriage to
Hyman himself a garrulous egoist very much in the tradition
of Jewish '50's New York intellectuals and by the visceral
shock of mothering a quartet of noisy, demanding babies. This
second Shirley Jackson dedicated herself to rejecting her
mother's sense of propriety, drank and smoked and fed to buttery
excess directly to blame for her and her husband's early
deaths dabbled in magic and voodoo, and interfered loudly when
she thought the provincial Vermont schools were doing an
injustice to her talented children. This was the Shirley Jackson
that the town feared, resented and, depending on whose version
you believe, occasionally persecuted.
The hostility of the villagers further shaped her psyche, and
her art; the process eventually redoubled so the latter fed the
former. After the enormous success of "The Lottery," a legend
arose in town, almost certainly false, that Jackson had been
pelted with stones by schoolchildren one day, then gone home and
written the story. The real crisis came near the end of her life,
resulting in a period of agoraphobia and psychosis; she wrote her
way through it in "We Have Always Lived in the Castle." In that novel, Jackson brilliantly isolates the two aspects in her psyche into two odd, damaged sisters: one hypersensitive and afraid, unable to leave the house, the other a sort of squalid demon
prankster who may or may not have murdered the rest of her family
for her fragile sister's sake. For me, it is that unique and
dreamlike book, rather than "The Lottery," that stands as her
masterpiece.
Next | How personality creeps into madness |