There isn't a moment in the film where you catch Binoche out of character. She's completely submerged in the role of Madame La. But a few days after seeing it, I have to say that nothing Binoche does in the film (or in the Carax or the Techine) has stayed in my memory as clearly as her performance in "Chocolat." That role, a movie star turn in a well-made trifle of a picture, doesn't require nearly as much acting as she's called upon to do here. In "Chocolat," Binoche's charisma is even more important to the part than her acting. But everything she does in it is distinct: the way she finds the appropriate tone for each customer as she doles out goodies; the flirtatious way she smiles at Johnny Depp or cuddles against him in a boat on a moonlit river; the desperation as she claws at the earth when she believes her little daughter has been killed.

It's easy to assume that what Binoche does in "Chocolat" is simply being a movie star and that what she does when working for Patrice Leconte or Andre Techine or Krzysztof Kieslowski (for whom she starred in "Blue") is, as Jon Lovitz's Master Thespian would say, "Acting!" That's partly true. It's also the whole problem. Binoche doesn't have a lot of star vanity. She'll play crazy or neurotic or frazzled without making it feel as if she's slumming. But her performances in those films, lived in and immersed in the character's reality, are almost always unaccountably opaque.

All I can recall of her performance in Leos Carax's "Bad Blood" is a brief black-and-white interlude where she's filmed as if she were a silent screen goddess. The camera adores her. Glamour is often talked of as if it puts performers beyond our reach, but Binoche is at her most accessible when she's at her most glamorous. She needs glamour to seem fully alive on screen. The glamour that art-house audiences respond to in Binoche is of another kind, the contemporary version of chic Continental angst, what actress Monica Vitti used to provide those early 1960s audiences with in Michelangelo Antonioni's films, like "L' Eclisse" "La Notte" and "L' Avventura. But it cancels Binoche out. Too much of the time she's so submerged in character that trying to figure out what's going on inside the people she plays is like trying to make out a message from someone trapped in a coal mine.

That's true of all three principals in "The Widow of Saint-Pierre." Leconte works with intelligence and craft and the movie should have been a satisfying costume melodrama. It's not badly made, but it's a drag. Leconte's virtues can't overcome the plodding glumness that prevails. Halfway through, I began to feel the movie was Leconte's penance for the frivolous high spirits and high style of his last film, the wonderful "Girl on the Bridge." He doesn't exactly drain the juice from the story, but the toniness of his approach dries it out.

The cinematographer, Eduardo Serra, was responsible for one of the most ravishing looking movies of the last 20 years, Iain Softley's marvelous film of "The Wings of the Dove." The earth and mud tones are certainly what this story calls for, but, like Leconte's direction, there's no pleasure in it. And as the film goes on, it's harder to get over the sense that something is missing -- or being ignored.

The movie is set in 1850 on a island belonging to France just off the coast of Newfoundland. A former fishing boat captain is murdered by two men, one of whom used to work under him. When that man Auguste (Emir Kusturica, the director of "Underground" and "Black Cat, White Cat," in his acting debut) is sentenced to death, it becomes the responsibility of the island's military captain (Daniel Auteuil) to imprison him until a guillotine can be shipped to the island. At his wife's behest, the Captain offers Auguste the chance to work as her gardener. Soon Auguste is traveling freely with Madame La over the island, doing chores for others (even, in his most heroic moment, saving the town's tavern) and becoming an accepted part of the island's life. That doesn't sit well with the island's Governor (Michel Duchaussoy), who is determined to carry out French justice by making sure the execution proceeds.

If it feels like something has been left out of that synopsis, it's no more than what's left out of the film itself. Nothing in the way the characters behave ever makes complete sense. Leconte is a little like a defense attorney trying to put the best face on the proceedings. But you can never get past the suspicion that he's not telling us the whole story. Becoming Madame La's gardener offers Auguste the chance not to be cooped up in his cell. It even brings him in contact with a young widowed mother whom he impregnates. But Auguste doesn't appear to have a drop of resentment at becoming Madame La's project, even though his whole treatment is grotesque, unthinking. When he shows up at the military barracks that also houses the Captain and Madame La, he's invited into their living quarters while she offers him tea and food and tells him to make himself at home, and nothing in Leconte's direction, in Claude Faraldo's script or in the way the scene is played hints at the appalling condescension of their behavior. They're almost a parody of liberal do-gooders who expect the recipients of their largesse to behave like appreciative little puppy dogs.

Now playing: Read all the recent movie reviews by Salon's critics