Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

Salon.com


[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Business ][ Comics ][ Health & Body ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ][ Audio ]

Article Finder



 


Books image

Hands off Harry Potter!
Have critics of J.K. Rowlings' books even read them?

By Chris Gregory

Since Harry Potter first flew into the American landscape a little more than a year ago, the unassuming lad and his rags-to-riches author have received accolades ranging from the distinguished (the UK's National Book Award, the Smarties Prize and so on) to the barely heard (my 10-year-old neighbor, who told me in an awed voice, "Those books weren't stupid"). Along with the praise came millions of dollars handed over by ecstatic children and equally ecstatic parents thrilled to be paying for anything with an intellectual range greater than Pokémon. The books were, everyone agreed, clever and funny and magical, and how nice that they were making a lot of money.

The backlash was inevitable.




Print story


E-mail story


Backflip This Story  Backflip this story to find it again


The three Harry Potter books tell the story of a young boy learning to become a wizard at a magical school called Hogwarts. At first glance, nothing here would seem offensive, especially given the comic tone of the books. (The third book has gotten a little darker, but only in comparison to an initial book that includes sentences like: "Professor McGonagall watched them turn a mouse into a snuffbox -- points were given for how pretty the snuffbox was, but taken away if it had whiskers.") But in today's hypersensitive cultural climate, anything can be found to have some offensive elements -- you just have to look hard enough.

First came the conservative pro-family Christian groups, ignoring more morally dubious -- but less popular -- works in a drive to remove the Harry Potter books from classrooms and libraries. These parents are concerned that the cheerful depiction of magic will tempt young readers enthralled with the books to leave Christianity and follow paganism.

If modern paganism could teach me to do half the stuff in these books, I'd be its most fervent convert. The students learn fun stuff like shrinking potions (which would certainly have enlivened my chemistry class), how to make a pineapple dance across your desk (which beats algebra, hands down) and how to fly on a broomstick (which leaves regular gym in the dust).

Unfortunately, modern witchcraft bears as much resemblance to Hogwarts' curriculum as my eighth-grade chemistry class did to Professor Snape's potions class, with the possible exception that my chemistry teacher was a lot nastier. Nor does Hogwarts seem to have any particular religious leanings outside of the annual, and very secular, Christmas party, and a few characters walking around with suspiciously classical names. A more valid critique would be that the books contain no trace of religion or religious observance whatsoever, doubtful at a time when the majority of us still do attend religious services.

It's worth noting also that the magic depicted by Rowlings does seem to have some moral sense attached to it. The few spells used to harm others usually backlash on the user in a riotously humorous or dreadful way. Thus, the evil Voldemort loses most of his powers after using magic to kill Harry's parents. And when Ron attempts to curse the school bully, Draco Malfoy, his wand backfires, and poor Ron spends the next few hours throwing up slugs. (Scenes like this explain why 10-year-olds love the books.)

Conservative groups have also expressed concern with the violence in the books, which, when compared to the typical Hollywood PG movie, seems terribly mild. Objections were also raised to the depiction of the Dursleys, the family that Harry has to spend his miserable summer vacations with. They are Muggles, people who can't do magic, and they are so awful that they become irresistibly funny. The Dursleys force Harry to sleep in a cupboard, constantly yell at him, hit him and prevent him from communicating with his friends. They give him a toothpick for a Christmas present. This is in marked contrast to the spoiling of their son, the nasty Dudley, who sobs on one birthday because he's only received 36 presents. His mother hastily comforts him with the promise of more gifts to come: "Dudley thought for a moment. It looked like hard work."

It must be admitted that the Dursleys do not present a positive picture of the traditional nuclear family. But the books also introduce us to the loving, nurturing Weasley family that has somehow managed to raise seven highly intelligent, charming kids. Unfortunately, they're also poor, barely able to afford their kids' school fees; their house ("it looked as though it had once been a large stone pigpen") is falling to pieces. And yet, when Harry visits Ron's family:

"It's a bit small," said Ron quickly. "Not like that room you had with the Muggles. And I'm right underneath the ghoul in the attic; he's always banging on the pipes and groaning." But Harry, grinning widely, said, "This is the best house I've ever been in."

Find a better statement for "family values" anywhere.

. Next page | Sexist? Only if you keep your humorless PC blinders on
1, 2, 3





 



Don't get sunburned!  Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




More great offers in
Salon Plus

____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • Father of the ecosystem In "The Invention of Air," Steven Johnson creates a fascinating portrait of Joseph Priestley, a friend of Franklin and Jefferson and a freethinker who changed history.
    By Andrew O'Hehir
  • The Holocaust memoir so heartwarming it had to be fake Herman Rosenblat's concentration-camp romance duped Oprah, among many others. Why are we so eager to put a happy ending on a tragedy?
    By Lev Raphael
  • How to live what Michael Pollan preaches Mark Bittman's revolutionary "Food Matters" is both a cookbook and a manifesto that shows us how to eat better -- and save the planet.
    By Laura Miller
  • Read it and weep The economic news couldn't be worse for the book industry. Now insiders are asking how literature will survive.
    By Jason Boog
  •  

    Maya Angelou reads from "The Heart of a Woman"



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Business | Comics | Health | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Technology and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright 2005 Salon.com


    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy