.


Salon













R E C E N T L Y

Do loose lips sink chips?
By Janelle Brown
Nondisclosure agreements are a way of life in Silicon Valley
(07/30/98)

Paul is live
By John Alderman
An interactive drama about a dead rock star makes a long-delayed debut
(07/29/98)

World war 3.0
By Andrew Leonard
A new book on futuristic "cyberwar" has an old-fashioned agenda
(07/28/98)

A lab for online experiments
By Spencer Ante
Does the Web need nonprofit funding to keep its edge?
(07/27/98)

The 21st Challenge No. 11 Results
By Charlie Varon and Jim Rosenau
The urge to merge: Viacom plus ConAgra equals ...?
(07/24/98)

- - - - - - - - - -

BROWSE THE
21ST FEATURE ARCHIVES

- - - - - - - - - -



THE PAPERLESS BOOK | PAGE 1, 2
- - - - - - - - - -

The tech world is also paying attention. Online Originals offers its books in two formats -- one for desktop computers and one for 3Com's PalmPilot. The majority of orders are for the PalmPilot version; in fact, book orders only took off after the company started offering books in PalmPilot format. (Initially, only the desktop format was available.) "Readers aren't comfortable reading novels off their desktop screens," explains Gettman. "People need to have tactile contact with what they're reading."

Gettman has confidence in the success of the PalmPilot and other hand-held computers as reading tablets. He points out the ways that the PalmPilot is like a book (it's light and portable) -- and the ways that it's better (it can store at least two books at a time; there are two type sizes; it automatically bookmarks a reader's place; it can search the book for any word or phrase, rendering indexes obsolete; the backlit screen can be read under bedcovers without a light). He enumerates the social benefits of online publishing: the environmental advantage of paperless books; the possibility of delivering books to schoolrooms containing only a phone line and a computer; the ability to get books into countries with strict censorship laws (many orders come from Malaysia and Indonesia).

3Com, it seems, has equal confidence in Online Originals. When the publisher needed access to 3,000 pounds ready cash -- a publicity fee publishers have to agree to pay if their nomination makes the short list for the Booker Prize -- 3Com came up with the money, offering to pay the sum on Online Originals' behalf should "The Angels of Russia" achieve that distinction.

Gettman and commissioning editor Christopher Macann founded Online Originals in 1996 to counteract what they saw as the negative effects of publishing-industry consolidation. As large entertainment conglomerates bought up smaller publishing houses, editors were losing control of their lists to marketing departments. In order to meet high overhead costs, publishing decisions were being driven by sales potential rather than by quality. The conglomerates were more likely to publish books by established authors or celebrities than experimental books or books that challenged conventional views.

As publishing standards fell at conventional publishing houses, Gettman saw an opportunity to use the Internet to combat that trend. "The Internet struck me as an alternative because the costs are low and we don't have to worry how many sales we get," says Gettman. "It takes us one evening to produce a book. We can afford to make decisions based on quality and interest rather than on what we will sell."

To keep their publishing standards high, Gettman and Macann test each prospective manuscript against a rigorous set of requirements. Every Online Original book must be original in the sense that it hasn't been published in any form, virtual or print, and original "in the sense that it expresses new ideas." It must be "well-written" and "intelligent." Most important, it must do more than simply attack ideas already in circulation.

"Intellectual history is a conversation," explains Gettman. "It needs positive contributions to continue. All Online Originals must make a positive contribution to the history of ideas or to literature." The editors, who receive one or two submissions per day, reject over 90 percent of all submissions, accepting one out of every 30 or 40 manuscripts.

Gettman and Macann also solicit manuscripts from authors whose writing they respect. Early on it wasn't easy to convince authors to submit, so the two -- a writer and professor, respectively -- published manuscripts of their own. Today, says Gettman, it's much easier to come by good manuscripts; many authors on the current list are writing second and third works solely for publication online.

The authors don't make a fortune from sales, but they're treated well by their publisher -- a rarity in today's cut-throat industry. Their 50 percent royalties well exceed industry standards. They're not pressured to make their books commercial. (Volunteer reviewers make editorial suggestions on accepted manuscripts, which authors may or may not choose to follow.) Also, once Online Originals has accepted an author, that author's next work will be accepted -- an arrangement Gettman says authors appreciate: "They don't have to think about marketing. They know we believe they have something to say."

Another rarity is the absence of overt marketing. With the exception of the free book, no book is hyped or treated preferentially. A short author biography and synopsis accompanies each sample chapter. Books aren't categorized as they are in bookstores; rather, they're presented in a frequently reordered list, to ensure that no title receives undue benefit from a top position. Gettman hopes that customers will browse the sample chapters and make their reading decisions based on quality, rather than on hype and presentation.

Will it work? Are readers really so autonomous? The quality of the books already published by Online Originals, at least, suggests there's a large pool of good writing untapped by conventional publishers. Some critics argue the company won't survive because its distribution method isn't viable. If a book can be sent by e-mail, the argument goes, no one will buy it, since book files can be redistributed free of charge. But the same argument applies to the music and software industries, neither of which has yet gone bankrupt, despite how easy it is to copy their products.

Eager fans of online publishing go overboard in the opposite direction -- suggesting that companies like Online Originals will be so successful they'll render print books a thing of the past. Gettman doesn't see it that way. He compares reading tablets to mobile phones, which haven't replaced stationary phones and have increased overall phone activity. He hopes his company will have a similar effect, increasing the number of quality books published both online and in print.

After all, he says, books are fundamentally about the writing they contain: "There's an eternal tradition of writing that goes on regardless of medium. The tradition of storytelling and explicating arguments continues, whether presented on parchment or scrolls or computers. We want to participate in that tradition."
SALON | July 31, 1998

Tamsin Todd is a writer living in London.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R E L A T E D_.S A L O N_.S T O R I E S

PalmPilot reading Is that little black box just "fashion technology," or the future face of computing?
By Robert Rossney
March 3, 1998

Do babes sell books? In the cutthroat publishing biz, a pretty face on the cover is worth a thousand blurbs.
By Lee Smith
July 30, 1997



Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.

[Features] [Let's Get This Straight] [Challenge] [Books] [Reviews]